Pfizer shot

Below are extracts from the emergency use application for the Pfizer “vaccine” you will see, that, this is a dangerous shot with no knowledge of any long term dangers. While reading thru the many charts I found very little good compared to the placebo.  The shot v placebo provides more complications. There are also some doubts as to effectiveness by the board.

——————————————————————————–

vaccine

[ vak-seen or, especially Britishvak-seen, -sin ]SHOW IPA

See synonyms for vaccine on Thesaurus.com

noun

any preparation used as a preventive inoculation to confer immunity against a specific disease, usually employing an innocuous form of the disease agent, as killed or weakened bacteria or viruses, to stimulate antibody production.

the virus of cowpox, used in vaccination, obtained from pox vesicles of a cow or person.

a software program that helps to protect against computer viruses, as by detecting them and warning the user.

——————————————————————————

Messenger RNA (mRNA)

Messenger RNA (mRNA) is a single-stranded RNA molecule that is complementary to one of the DNA strands of a gene. The mRNA is an RNA version of the gene that leaves the cell nucleus and moves to the cytoplasm where proteins are made. During protein synthesis, an organelle called a ribosome moves along the mRNA, reads its base sequence, and uses the genetic code to translate each three-base triplet, or codon, into its corresponding amino acid.

————————————————————————

(emphasis added by me)

from the EUA

https://www.fda.gov/media/144416/download

  1. Executive Summary
    On November 20, 2020, the Sponsor (Pfizer, on behalf of Pfizer and BioNTech) submitted an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) request to FDA for an investigational COVID-19 vaccine
    (BNT162b2) intended to prevent COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The vaccine is based on the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein (S)
    antigen encoded by RNA and formulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). The proposed use under an EUA is “for active immunization for the prevention of COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 in
    individuals 16 years of age and older.” The proposed dosing regimen is 2 doses, 30 µg each, administered 21 days apart.

pg 7
• The chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) agent referred to in the March 27, 2020, EUA declaration by the Secretary of HHS (SARS-CoV-2) can cause a
serious or life-threatening disease or condition.

2.3. EUA Request for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (BNT162b2)
Pfizer, in partnership with BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH, is developing a vaccine to prevent
COVID-19 which is based on the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein (S) antigen encoded by RNA and formulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNP). The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (also
referred to as BNT162b2) is administered intramuscularly as a 2-dose series spaced 21 days apart at a dose of 30 µg each. The vaccine is supplied as a multi-dose vial (5 doses) containing
a frozen suspension (-80°C to -60°C) of BNT162b2 that must be thawed and diluted with 1.8 mL of sterile 0.9% sodium chloride, allowing for five 0.3 mL doses. The vaccine is preservative free.

3.1. Vaccine Composition, Dosing Regimen
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is a white to off-white, sterile, preservative-free, frozen suspension for intramuscular injection. The vaccine contains a nucleoside-modified messenger
RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2. The vaccine also includes the following ingredients: lipids ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-
hexyldecanoate), 2-[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 1,2-distearoyl-snglycero-3-phosphocholine, and cholesterol), potassium chloride, monobasic potassium
phosphate, sodium chloride, dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and sucrose.

(wow thats a lot of crap in that shot, including the chemical used to put people to death)

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is supplied as a frozen [between -80°C to -60°C (-
112°F to -76°F)] multi-dose (5-dose) vial. The vaccine must be thawed and diluted in its original
vial with 1.8 mL of sterile 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP prior to administration. After
dilution, the vial contains 5 doses of 0.3 mL per dose. After dilution, the multiple-dose vials must
be stored between 2°C to 25°C (35°F to 77°F) and used within 6 hours from the time of dilution.

Reactogenicity data from a total of 100
adolescents 12 through 15 years of age enrolled in C4591001 Phase 2/3 were provided in the
EUA submission. However, the Sponsor did not request inclusion of this age group in the EUA
because the available data, including number of participants and follow-up duration, were
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Emergency Use Authorization Review Memorandum insufficient to support favorable a benefit-risk determination at this time. Therefore, the reactogenicity data for participants 12 through 15 years of age are not presented in this
document.

Suspected COVID-19 Cases
As specified in the protocol, suspected cases of symptomatic COVID-19 that were not PCRconfirmed were not recorded as adverse events unless they met regulatory criteria for seriousness. Two serious cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 were reported, both in the vaccine group, and narratives were reviewed. In one case, a 36-year-old male with no
medical comorbidities experienced fever, malaise, nausea, headache and myalgias beginning on the day of Dose 2 and was hospitalized 3 days later for further evaluation of apparent infiltrates on chest radiograph and treatment of dehydration. A nasopharyngeal PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 was negative on the day of admission, and a chest CT was reported as normal.
The participant was discharged from the hospital 2 days after admission. With chest imaging findings that are difficult to reconcile, it is possible that this event represented reactogenicity
following the second vaccination, a COVID-19 case with false negative test that occurred less than 7 days after completion of the vaccination series, or an unrelated infectious process.

In the other case, a 66-year-old male with no medical comorbidities experienced fever, myalgias, and shortness of breath beginning 28 days post-Dose 2 and was hospitalized one day later with
abnormal chest CT showing a small left-sided consolidation. He was discharged from the hospital 2 days later, and multiple nasopharyngeal PCR tests collected over a 10-day period
beginning 2 days after symptom onset were negative. It is possible, though highly unlikely, that this event represents a COVID-19 case with multiple false negative tests that occurred more
than 7 days after completion of the vaccination regimen, and more likely that it represents an unrelated infectious process
Among 3,410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall studypopulation, 1,594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group. Suspected
COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine
group vs. 287 in the placebo group. It is possible that the imbalance in suspected COVID-19
cases occurring in the 7 days postvaccination represents vaccine reactogenicity with symptoms
that overlap with those of COVID-19. Overall though, these data do not raise a concern that
protocol-specified reporting of suspected, but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases could have masked
clinically significant adverse events that would not have otherwise been detected.

Vaccine effectiveness against long-term effects of COVID-19 disease
COVID-19 disease may have long-term effects on certain organs, and at present it is not possible to assess whether the vaccine will have an impact on specific long-term sequelae of
COVID-19 disease in individuals who are infected despite vaccination. Demonstrated high efficacy against symptomatic COVID-19 should translate to overall prevention of COVID-19-
related sequelae in vaccinated populations, though it is possible that asymptomatic infections
may not be prevented as effectively as symptomatic infections and may be associated with
sequelae that are either late-onset or undetected at the time of infection (e.g., myocarditis).
Additional evaluations will be needed to assess the effect of the vaccine in preventing long-term
effects of COVID-19, including data from clinical trials and from the vaccine’s use post authorization.

A numerically greater number of appendicitis cases occurred in the vaccine group but occurred
no more frequently than expected in the given age groups and do not raise a clear concern at
this time for a causal relationship to study vaccination. Although the safety database revealed
an imbalance of cases of Bell’s palsy (4 in the vaccine group and none in the placebo group),
causal relationship is less certain because the number of cases was small and not more
frequent than expected in the general population. Further signal detection efforts for these
adverse events will be informative with more widespread use of the vaccine.

Some pointed out the importance of long-term safety data for the PfizerBioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine as it is made using a technology not used in previously licensed vaccines.

The lack of data on how the vaccine impacts asymptomatic infection and viral shedding was
also pointed out and that this should be addressed prior to study unblinding. Other committee
members were concerned about limited data available in certain subpopulations such as HIVinfected individuals, individuals with prior exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and certain demographic
groups.

Reports of lymphadenopathy were imbalanced with notably more cases in the vaccine group
(64) vs. the placebo group (6), which is plausibly related to vaccination. Bell’s palsy was
reported by four vaccine participants and none in the placebo group.

 

 

 

 

 

=

 

2 thoughts on “Pfizer shot”

  1. DC Dirty Laundry
    HOME
    NEWS
    POLITICS
    CULTURE
    2ND AMENDMENT
    CHRISTIANITY
    VIDEOS
    STORE
    RIGHT REPORT
    Search for
    Search for
    Videos
    Bombshell: Moderna Chief Medical Officer Admits MRNA Alters DNA
    Photo of Suzanne Hamner Suzanne HamnerMarch 13, 2021 5 minutes read

    Share
    Tweet
    Share
    Pin
    Several prominent physicians, doctors, Sons of Liberty Media Health and Wellness expert Kate Shemirani, her colleague Dr. Kevin Corbett, and I have postulated that the current experimental mRNA injection for coronavirus, aka COVID-19, could alter one’s genetic code or DNA. Bill Gates stated it, which was included in my video “Human Genome 8 and mRNA Vaccine” on Brighteon.com. It is one reason the term “experimental human genome altering mRNA injection” has been used to describe the jab being foisted onto the mostly unsuspecting public. While many in the media, Dr. Anthony Fauci and his merry band of chronic liars, and “fact checkers” have declared this claim as false, a video of a TEDx Beacon Street talk by Tal Zaks, chief medical officer of Moderna, Inc., one pharmaceutical company manufacturer of the experimental mRNA technology injection, confirms mRNA injection for COVID-19 can change your genetic code or DNA. This TEDx Beacon Street talk occurred in 2017. H/T to YouTube channel Silview Media Backup Channel.

    #AskTheExperts – Doctors, Nurses & Health Care Professionals From Around The World: “The COVID Vaccine Is Neither Safe Nor Effective” (Video)
    #AskTheExperts II: Medical Professionals Address BBC Panorama Anti-Vaxx Propaganda (Video) #DareToThink
    #AskTheExperts – Shemirani, Corbett, Madej & Kaufman – The Vaccine Rollout Has Begun, Here’s What You’re Not Being Told!
    Nurse & Nutritionist Kate Shemirani: Experimental COVID Injection Doesn’t Fulfill Legal Requirement & Definition For A Vaccine, But Does Fulfill Definition Of A “Device” (Video)
    Zaks calls it “hacking the software of life”. In the first minute of the video Zaks states, “we’ve been living this phenomenal digital scientific revolution, and I’m here today to tell you, that we are actually hacking the software of life, and that it’s changing the way we think about prevention and treatment of disease.” [Emphasis mine.] He even repeats that they (Moderna) think of it like an operating system, which the Moderna website indicates as “Our Operating System”.

    At one minute in, Zaks states, “In every cell there’s this thing called messenger RNA or mRNA for short, that transmits the critical information from the DNA in our genes to the protein, which is really the stuff we’re all made out of. This is the critical information that determines what the cell will do. So we think about it as an operating system. …. So if you could actually change that, … if you could introduce a line of code, or change a line of code, it turns out, that has profound implications for everything, from the flu to cancer.” [Emphasis mine.]
    take our poll – story continues below
    Would You Vote for Trump If He Runs In 2024?
    When “changing” a line of code or “introducing” a line of code” (referring to DNA), the “code” or DNA is then altered, meaning the individual or “subject” has now had their genome changed to what the “scientists” have coded. The individual or subject is no longer a creation of God but a creation of man, meaning the individual or subject could be the object of a “patent”. He goes on to say, the mRNA would tell the cells to “code” for the protein of the “virus”. This “viral protein” is foreign to the body. The individual’s body is making a foreign protein the immune system is to attack. When the body makes a protein the immune system then attacks, your immune system is attacking a protein your body is making, meaning what is occurring in an “auto-immune response” or “auto-immune disease”.

    This has been repeated a number of times by experts, physicians, nurses and countless others. As readers can see, none of us were “whistling Dixie”. Zaks talks about turning this system on; however, there is no way to turn it off. When do the cells know to stop making this “viral protein”? The cells don’t; therefore, this continues for the duration.

    In a normal vaccine, the immune system attacks the limited amount of “particles” in the adjuvant to produce antibodies or immune response that the body can recognize at a later time if the individual comes in contact with the same or similar “particle”.

    Dr. Lee Merritt On Experimental “Operating System” Injections: We’re Going To See A Lot Of Deaths
    Dr Sherri Tenpenny: FDA Has Broken The Law At Least Twice Concerning COVID Injections (Video)
    Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: How The Depopulation COVID Vaccines Will Start Working In 3-6 Months
    The Vaccine Interview You Really Should Hear To Educate Yourself With Dr. Sherri Tenpenny (Video)
    TRENDING: Liberal Protesters Wreak Lawless Havoc in Downtown D.C.
    The study Zaks cites at the 3:12 minute mark can be found and read here. The abstract is contained on the NIH Pub Med Library website. In the full test of the study on ResearchGate, the mention of “Luciferase” occurs on page 10. A crucial piece of information in this study is contained on page 4 – “Ferrets immunized with 200 micrograms and challenged [exposed to influenza H7N9 via IN (intranasal)] on day 49 had viral loads below the level of detection”. If a viral load was “below the level of detection”, two questions emerge: 1) did the ferrets even contract H7N9 through intranasal challenge; and, 2) if a viral load is below the level of detection, how do you know the animals even had a viral load? This would bring into question the efficacy of the injection.

    Trending:
    Sorry. No data so far.

    Moreover, the studies Zaks cites as occurring in humans only lasted approximately 18 months.

    At about the 4:00 minute mark, Zaks begins discussing mRNA vaccines for cancer. Immediately following that, Zaks discusses a children’s condition where a gene or “code” is missing that causes production of a certain enzyme critical for metabolism where the current treatment is to transplant an entire organ – in this case, the liver. Zaks proposes to inject mRNA that codes for the missing gene, a gene contained in DNA on the human genome, it would “correct” the genetic defect.

    Ask this question: what causes the cells/body to produce needed enzymes/proteins? Zaks answers that by saying the genetic code or DNA. So, mRNA has to alter a genetic code or the DNA for the body to produce the proteins of COVID-19 for the body to mount an immune response.

    Medical Doctors: “You Are Being Played” – “The SARS-C0v2 Virus Does Not Exist”
    The Virus Lies & What They Are Leading Towards With Dr. Andrew Kaufman
    Dr. Lee Merritt: The Vaxx Is Preparing World For Mass Death Event (Video)
    America’s Frontline Doctor Simone Gold Warns Of Risks In “Experimental COVID Vaccine” (Video)
    Out of the words of Tal Zaks of Moderna, mRNA can alter the human genome. Whether by design or “unintended consequences”, this technology is being used to do just that. He calls this “information therapy”; although, some would call it “mad science”. In attempts to “rewrite” genetic code to correct defects, studies have shown there were “cascading failures”. In other words, changing one “defective gene” in one genome caused other genes to “fail” or cause problems. And, it was not just one subsequent gene becoming defective, but many. This is more than likely why there are over 400 adverse events surrounding the experimental mRNA injection.

    So, the next time someone claims these “vaccines” do not alter the human genome or DNA, you can refer that individual to Tal Zaks of Moderna, Inc. who claims otherwise. Dr. Fauci should be eating some four and twenty blackbird (crow) pie.

    Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

    Suzanne Hamner (pen name) is a registered nurse, grandmother of 4, and a political independent residing in the state of Georgia, who is trying to mobilize the Christian community in her area to stand up and speak out against tyrannical government, invasion by totalitarian political systems masquerading as religion and get back to the basics of education.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *